How to Compare Apples and Oranges: Poverty Measurement Based on Different Definitions of Consumption.
Poverty rates calculated on the basis of household consumption expenditures are routinely compared across countries and time. The surveys which underlie these comparisons typically differ in the types of food and non-food expenditures included, often in ways which are easily overlooked by analysts. With several examples we demonstrate that these commonly occurring variations in expenditure definitions can give rise to marked differences in poverty rates where there are no real differences in well-being. We show that one approach to calculating poverty lines, used with the headcount measure of poverty, can allow comparisons based on data with different definitions of consumption. In addition to allowing comparative poverty analysis using existing survey data, the results suggest that poverty monitoring could be done effectively at lower cost by alternating detailed expenditure surveys with far more abbreviated surveys. Copyright 2001 by The International Association for Research in Income and Wealth.
Year of publication: |
2001
|
---|---|
Authors: | Lanjouw, Jean Olson ; Lanjouw, Peter |
Published in: |
Review of Income and Wealth. - International Association for Research in Income and Wealth - IARIW. - Vol. 47.2001, 1, p. 25-42
|
Publisher: |
International Association for Research in Income and Wealth - IARIW |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Welfare in villages and towns: micro-measurement of poverty and inequality
Elbers, Chris, (2000)
-
Rural nonfarm employment : a survey ; background paper for World development report 1995
Lanjouw, Jean Olson, (1995)
-
Poverty comparisons with noncompatible data : theory and illustrations
Lanjouw, Jean Olson, (1997)
- More ...