In defence of critical realism : a reply to Baxter and Chua and Andrew and Baker
Purpose: This is a reply to the commentaries by Baxter and Chua (2020) and Andrew and Baker (2020) on a paper previously published in this journal. Design/methodology/approach: This is a conceptual discussion that further clarifies the differences between critical realism (CR), actor–network theory (ANT) and traditional Marxist thought as a basis for critical accounting research. Findings: The relative merits of CR as a basis for critical accounting research are further elucidated in the light of the criticisms raised in the commentaries. In particular, the discussion of its role as a counterweight to the legacy of empiricism that hampers the possibilities of advancing radical social critique and emancipation is further developed. Research limitations/implications: The paper clarifies what CR can and cannot do for the critical accounting project and how it may be further developed as a vehicle for emancipation. Originality/value: The paper extends the debate about what critical accounting research is and could be.
Year of publication: |
2020
|
---|---|
Authors: | Modell, Sven |
Published in: |
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. - Emerald, ISSN 0951-3574, ZDB-ID 2018956-4. - Vol. 33.2020, 3 (02.03.), p. 666-674
|
Publisher: |
Emerald |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Yang, ChunLei, (2013)
-
MODELL, SVEN, (2005)
-
Balancing acts in qualitative accounting research
Modell, Sven, (2008)
- More ...