Investment Liberalization and Cross-Border Acquisitions: The Effect of Partial Foreign Ownership
This paper investigates the optimal strategy for a multinational to conduct FDI. We find that the incentives to use acquisition rather than greenfield investment change significantly if the multinational is allowed to have already an ownership interest in the target local firm before the market is fully liberalized. Interestingly, when investment costs are sufficiently high, the multinational prefers not entering the market at all with partial ownership in place, whereas a cross-border takeover would be the optimal entry mode otherwise. For intermediate levels of entry costs, holding a stake in the local producer reverses positively the profitability of a full acquisition compared to greenfield investment. Copyright © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Fatica, Serena |
Published in: |
Review of International Economics. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 0965-7576. - Vol. 18.2010, 2, p. 320-333
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Investment liberalization and cross-border acquisitions : the effect of partial foreign ownership
Fatica, Serena, (2010)
-
Do corporate taxes distort capital allocation? : cross-country evidence from industry-level data
Fatica, Serena, (2013)
-
Business capital accumulation and the user cost : is there a heterogeneity bias?
Fatica, Serena, (2018)
- More ...