Machlup's misrepresentation of Hutchison's methodology
Hutchison's 1938 essay has been mainly interpreted as introducing positivism and ultra-empiricism into economics. Such interpretations misrepresent his position. While he clearly drew on logical positivism, his methodology stems from a more moderate form of empiricism. However the issue at stake is not the exact degree of Hutchison's empiricism, but rather the extent to which such negative labelling has trivialised his position and distracted attention from the main concern of his 1938 essay. This was to mount a sustained and systematic criticism of the traditional abstract-deductive method in economics. In its place Hutchison sought to promote a more empirical, inductive approach. The paper is concerned with demonstrating the extent to which Machlup failed to provide evidence of Hutchison's ultra-empiricism. It thereby seeks to clear the way towards a reappraisal of Hutchison's methodology and towards a reappraisal of its relevance in our post-positivist era.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hart, John |
Published in: |
Journal of Economic Methodology. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1350-178X. - Vol. 16.2009, 3, p. 325-340
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Is money real? : An appraisal of Minsky's financial instability hypothesis
Hart, John, (1992)
-
The new book of California tomorrow : reflections and projections from the golden state
Hart, John, (1984)
-
Terence Hutchison and Frank Knight : a reappraisal of their 1940 - 1941 exchange
Hart, John, (2010)
- More ...