Manipulation in group argument evaluation

Given an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions on the status of the arguments. If the group needs to reach a common po- sition on the argumentation framework, the question is how the individual evaluations can be mapped into a collective one. This problem has been recently investigated in [1]. In this paper, we study under which conditions these operators are Pareto optimal and whether they are manipulable.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2011
Authors:	Podlaszewski, Mikolaj ; Pigozzi, Gabriella ; Caminada, Martin
Institutions:	Université Paris-Dauphine (Paris IX)
Subject:	Collective decision making \| Argumentation \| Judgment aggregation \| Social choice theory

More details

Extent:	application/pdf
Series:	Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine.
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Notes:	Published in Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011),,
Classification:	C44 - Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research ; D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
Source:	RePEc - Research Papers in Economics

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010708833