Market Driven Network Neutrality and the Fallacies of Internet Traffic Quality Regulation
In the U.S. paying for priority arrangements between Internet access service providers and Internet application providers to favor some traffic over other traffic is considered unreasonable discrimination. In Europe the focus is on minimum traffic quality requirements. It can be shown that neither market power nor universal service arguments can justify traffic quality regulation. In particular, heterogeneous demand for traffic quality for time sensitive versus time insensitive applications requires traffic quality differentiation, priority pricing and evolutionary development of minimum traffic qualities
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Gunter, Knieps |
Publisher: |
[S.l.] : SSRN |
Subject: | Internet | Netzregulierung | Access regulation | Regulierung | Regulation | Dienstleistungsqualität | Service quality | Marktmacht | Market power | Universaldienst | Universal service |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of Internet traffic quality regulation
Knieps, Günter, (2011)
-
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of internet traffic quality regulation
Knieps, Günter, (2011)
-
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacy of a two-tiered Internet traffic regulation
Knieps, Günter, (2014)
- More ...