Market vs. Limit Orders: The SuperDOT Evidence on Order Submission Strategy
This paper discusses performance measures for market and limit orders. We suggest two measures: one for precommitted traders (who must trade) and another for passive traders (who are indifferent to trading). We compute these measures for a sample of NYSE SuperDOT orders. The results suggest that the limit order placement strategies most commonly used by NYSE SuperDOT traders do in fact perform best. Limit orders placed at or better than the prevailing quote perform better than do market orders, even after imputing a penalty for unexecuted orders, and after taking into account market order price improvement. Unconditional order submission strategies that use SuperDOT to offer liquidity in competition with the specialist do not appear to be profitable.
Year of publication: |
1996
|
---|---|
Authors: | Harris, Lawrence ; Hasbrouck, Joel |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 31.1996, 02, p. 213-231
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Market vs. Limit Orders: The SuperDOT Evidence on Order Submission Strategy
Harris, Lawrence, (1996)
-
Market vs limit orders : the SuperDOT evidence on order submission strategy
Harris, Lawrence E., (1996)
-
Market vs. Limit Orders : The Superdot Evidence on Order Submission Strategy
Harris, Lawrence E., (2008)
- More ...