Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: An Australian survey of health issues
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALYs gained, irrespective of how the gains are distributed. In a cross section of Australians such a policy of distributive neutrality received: (a) very little support when health benefits to young people compete with health benefits to the elderly; (b) only moderate support when those who can become a little better compete with those who can become much better; (c) only moderate support when smokers compete with non smokers; (d) some support when young children compete with newborns; and (e) wide spread support when parents of dependent children compete with people without children. Overall, the views of the study population were strongly egalitarian. A policy of health benefit maximization received very limited support when the consequence is a loss of equity and access to services for the elderly and for people with a limited potential for improving their health.
Year of publication: |
1995
|
---|---|
Authors: | Nord, Erik ; Richardson, Jeff ; Street, Andrew ; Kuhse, Helga ; Singer, Peter |
Published in: |
Social Science & Medicine. - Elsevier, ISSN 0277-9536. - Vol. 41.1995, 10, p. 1429-1437
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | QALY equity egalitarian priority health economics |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Who cares about cost? Does economic analysis impose or reflect social values?
Nord, Erik, (1995)
-
William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics
Singer, Peter, (1995)
-
The value of life: individual preferences and social choice. A comment to Magnus Johannesson
Nord, Erik, (2003)
- More ...