MIXED OLIGOPOLY, SEQUENTIAL ENTRY, AND SPATIAL PRICE DISCRIMINATION
"This paper is the first to examine the welfare consequences of a public firm in a traditional model of spatial price discrimination. It demonstrates that when a private firm acts as a Stackelberg location leader, the presence of a public firm always improves welfare. Moreover, when three firms locate sequentially, the presence of a public firm improves social welfare unless it locates last. Thus, despite examining a variety of location timings, including simultaneous location, privatization never improves welfare and usually harms welfare. This conclusion differs from several currently in the literature in which privatization often improves welfare. "("JEL "L13, L32, L33, L52) Copyright (c) 2008 Western Economic Association International.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | HEYWOOD, JOHN S. ; YE, GUANGLIANG |
Published in: |
Economic Inquiry. - Western Economic Association International - WEAI, ISSN 0095-2583. - Vol. 47.2009, 3, p. 589-597
|
Publisher: |
Western Economic Association International - WEAI |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Strategic delegation in an international mixed oligopoly
Heywood, John S., (2021)
-
How does a public innovator license a foreign rival?
Heywood, John S., (2018)
-
Mixed oligopoly and spatial price discrimination with foreign firms
Heywood, John S., (2009)
- More ...