Modelling Aggregate Demand for Labour: A Reply to Dowrick and Wells
Dowrick and Wells (2004) have attempted to point to what they see as a number of fundamental misinterpretations in a recent paper by Lewis and MacDonald (2002) estimating demand for labour in Australia. However, it is argued here that it is a particular assumption about a nominal price setting that leads to their results being different from that of the standard literature on labour demand. When the usual assumption are adopted, the results of Lewis and MacDonald (2002) hold and, therefore, are correct. Copyright © 2004 Economic Society of Australia..
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | LEWIS, PHILIP E.T. ; MACDONALD, GARRY |
Published in: |
The Economic Record. - Economic Society of Australia - ESA, ISSN 1475-4932. - Vol. 80.2004, 251, p. 441-444
|
Publisher: |
Economic Society of Australia - ESA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Elasticity of Demand for Labour in Australia
Lewis, Philip E.T., (2002)
-
Modelling Aggregate Demand for Labour: A Reply to Dowrick and Wells
Lewis, Philip E.T., (2004)
-
The role of relative wages in the substitution between young and adult workers in Australia
Lewis, Philip E.T., (1983)
- More ...