Models and Reality: the Curios Case of the Absent Abstention
We discuss two inter-related puzzling features of the literature on a priori voting power. First, the mathematical model used in virtually all this literature does not recognize abstention as an option distinct from both a 'yes' and a 'no' vote. Second, reallife decision rules of voting bodies - in particular the US legislature and the UN Security Council - are misrepresented as though they did not allow abstention as a tertium quid. We suggest that these misrepresentations may be examples of what philosophers of science call 'theory-laden observation'.
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Felsenthal, Dan S. ; Machover, Moshé |
Published in: |
Homo Oeconomicus. - Institute of SocioEconomics. - Vol. 19.2002, p. 297-310
|
Publisher: |
Institute of SocioEconomics |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Annexations and alliances: When are blocs advantageous a priori?
Felsenthal, Dan S., (2002)
-
The Measurement of Voting Power
Felsenthal, Dan S.,
-
Myths and Meanings of Voting Power
Felsenthal, Dan S., (2001)
- More ...