Neoclassical versus Frontier Production Models? Testing for the Skewness of Regression Residuals
The empirical literature on production and cost functions is divided into two strands. The neoclassical approach concentrates on model parameters, while the frontier approach decomposes the disturbance term to a symmetric noise term and a positively skewed inefficiency term. We propose a theoretical justification for the skewness of the inefficiency term, arguing that this skewness is the key testable hypothesis of the frontier approach. We propose to test the regression residuals for skewness in order to distinguish the two competing approaches. Our test builds directly upon the asymmetry of regression residuals and does not require any prior distributional assumptions. Copyright © The editors of the "Scandinavian Journal of Economics" 2009. .
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kuosmanen, Timo ; Fosgerau, Mogens |
Published in: |
Scandinavian Journal of Economics. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 1467-9442. - Vol. 111.2009, 2, p. 351-367
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Neoclassical versus frontier production models? Testing for the skewness of regression residuals
Kuosmanen, Timo, (2009)
-
Neoclassical versus frontier production models? Testing for the skewness of regression residuals
Kuosmanen, Timo, (2009)
-
Neoclassical versus Frontier Production Models? Testing for the Skewness of Regression Residuals
Kuosmanen, Timo, (2009)
- More ...