On the genericity of full surplus extraction in mechanism design
Heifetz and Neeman [A. Heifetz, Z. Neeman, On the generic (im)possibility of full surplus extraction, Econometrica 74 (2006) 213-233], using convex combinations of models, showed that full surplus extraction (FSE) in mechanism design is generically impossible, contrary to the seminal work of Cremer and McLean [J. Cremer, R. McLean, Full extraction of the surplus in Bayesian and dominant strategy auctions, Econometrica 53 (1988) 345-361]. Since Cremer and McLean did not allow convex combinations of models, the two results are not comparable. We show that FSE is generically impossible when convex combinations of models are not allowed, provided that we do not hold fixed the cardinality of models.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Barelli, Paulo |
Published in: |
Journal of Economic Theory. - Elsevier, ISSN 0022-0531. - Vol. 144.2009, 3, p. 1320-1332
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Full surplus extraction Mechanism design Universal beliefs space Common knowledge |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Consistent beliefs in extensive form games
Barelli, Paulo, (2010)
-
Consistency of beliefs and epistemic conditions for Nash and correlated equilibria
Barelli, Paulo, (2009)
-
Barelli, Paulo, (2004)
- More ...