Pascal’s and Tabarrok’s Wagers
In a recent paper A. Tabarrok [Believe in Pascal’s Wager? Have I Got a Deal for You!, Theory and Decision 48, 123--128, 2000] argued that a believer who accepts Pascal’s Wager should in addition accept payment of any given fee in return for a given increase in the probability of reaching God. However the conclusion is obtained from manipulations of infinities which are not valid in an expected utility model. In this note, an alternative model is formulated in which Tabarrok’s conclusion can be obtained. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Østerdal, Lars |
Published in: |
Theory and Decision. - Springer. - Vol. 57.2004, 1, p. 1-4
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Subject: | Pascal’s Wager | Tabarrok’s Wager |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Merging and splitting in cooperative games: some (im)possibility results
Knudsen, Peter, (2012)
-
Rationing in the presence of baselines
Hougaard, Jens, (2013)
-
Hougaard, Jens, (2011)
- More ...