Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university
This study investigates the relationship between bibliometric indicators and the outcomes of peer reviews. Based on a case study of research groups at the University of Bergen, Norway, we examine how various bibliometric indicators correlate with evaluation ratings given by expert committees. The analysis shows positive but relatively weak correlations for all the selected indicators. Particular attention is devoted to the reasons for the discrepancies. We find that shortcomings of the peers' assessments, of the bibliometric indicators, as well as lack of comparability, can explain why the correlation was not stronger. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Aksnes, Dag W ; Taxt, Randi Elisabeth |
Published in: |
Research Evaluation. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0958-2029. - Vol. 13.2004, 1, p. 33-41
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The relational dynamics in the extended teams of academic spin-offs : a Norwegian case-study
Taxt, Randi Elisabeth, (2022)
-
Science policy and the driving forces behind the internationalisation of science: The case of Norway
Aksnes, Dag W, (2008)
-
Characteristics of highly cited papers
Aksnes, Dag W, (2003)
- More ...