Portfolio Selection with Quadratic Utility Revisited
Considering a simple portfolio selection problem by agents with quadratic utility, an apparently counterintuitive outcome results. When such a choice is over two assets that can be ordered in terms of riskiness, an agent that is more risk averse may optimally invest a larger portion of wealth in the riskier asset. It is shown that such an outcome is not counterintuitive, since for the portfolios from which agents optimally choose, a larger proportion of investment in the riskier asset leads to a less risky portfolio. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory (2004) 29, 137–144. doi:10.1023/B:GEPA.0000046566.50332.5b
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Mathews, Timothy |
Published in: |
The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review. - Palgrave Macmillan, ISSN 1554-964X. - Vol. 29.2004, 2, p. 137-144
|
Publisher: |
Palgrave Macmillan |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Mathews, Timothy, (2004)
-
A risk averse seller in a continuous time auction with a buyout option
Mathews, Timothy, (2003)
-
Portfolio selection with quadratic utility revisited
Mathews, Timothy, (2004)
- More ...