Preference Intensities and Risk Aversion in School Choice: A Laboratory Experiment

We experimentally investigate in the laboratory two prominent mechanisms that are employed in school choice programs to assign students to public schools. We study how individual behavior is influenced by preference intensities and risk aversion. Our main results show that (a) the GaleShapley mechanism is more robust to changes in cardinal preferences than the Boston mechanism independently of whether individuals can submit a complete or only a restricted ranking of the schools and (b) subjects with a higher degree of risk aversion are more likely to play safer strategies under the GaleShapley but not under the Boston mechanism. Both results have important implications for the efficiency and the stability of the mechanisms.