Proposed changes in interest rate criteria and the amortization method for repayment of federal hydro-power investments
Where review of government policies followed in charging interest on unrepaid investment (32% of total program cost) disclosed those interest rates were less than cost to the US Treasury to borrow funds to finance federal programs, IG recommended consideration of policy changes to recover interest costs on new project more closely to true costs, i.e., perhaps use of a weighted average over entire construction period. Also, a policy to amortize all unrepaid investments on a simultaneous basis should be developed. Comments are appended from the Assistant Secretary for Resource Applications, and from the Director of the Office of Power Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (PSB)
Year of publication: |
2007-05-14
|
---|---|
Subject: | energy planning, policy and economy | geothermal energy | HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS | AMORTIZATION | FINANCING | INTEREST RATE | GOVERNMENT POLICIES | INVESTMENT | CONSTRUCTION | COST RECOVERY | ECONOMIC POLICY | ELECTRIC POWER | FEDERAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS | HYDROELECTRIC POWER | MAINTENANCE | MARKETING | OPERATING COST | PAYBACK PERIOD | US DOE | COST | ENERGY SOURCES | NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS | POWER | POWER PLANTS | RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES | US ORGANIZATIONS |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
ELSA: an electric power supply analysis model for the Pacific Northwest. [Effects of developments]
Harrington, T.P., (2008)
-
United States. Bonneville Power Administration., (2009)
-
Geothermal loan guaranty cash flow model: description and users' manual
Keimig, M.A., (2007)
- More ...