PUBLIC V. PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT IN THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS SECTOR
The 2002 Common Regulatory Framework diversifies remedies to competition problems according to the market strength of telecoms providers. One set of remedies is particularly targeted at posing constraints on (pre-)existing significant market power (SMP) in the relevant market. Those remedies are provided for in the Access and Interconnection Directive and in ascending order of intrusiveness they are transparency obligation, non-discrimination obligation, accounting separation, access obligation and price control. A second set of measures are meant to apply to all telecoms providers irrespective whether they have market power or not. This set of measures is introduced by the Universal Service Directive (USD).
Year of publication: |
2009-06-15
|
---|---|
Authors: | Stoyanova, Milena |
Institutions: | Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), European University Institute |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Public v. private enforcement in the electronic communications sector
Stoyanova, Milena, (2009)
-
The dangers of over-regulation in the electronic communications sector
Stoyanova, Milena, (2007)
-
Stoyanova, Milena, (2008)
- More ...