Rebuttal of 'On Nonparametric Identification of Treatment Effects in Duration Models'

In their IZA Discussion Paper 10247, Johansson and Lee claim that the main result (Proposition 3) in Abbring and Van den Berg (2003b) does not hold. We show that their claim is incorrect. At a certain point within their line of reasoning, they make a rather basic error while transforming one random variable into another random variable, and this leads them to draw incorrect conclusions. As a result, their paper can be discarded

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2016
Authors:	Abbring, Jaap H.
Other Persons:	Berg, Gerard J. van den (contributor)
Publisher:	[2016]: [S.l.] : SSRN
Subject:	Nichtparametrisches Verfahren \| Nonparametric statistics \| Theorie \| Theory \| Statistische Bestandsanalyse \| Duration analysis \| Dauer \| Duration \| Kausalanalyse \| Causality analysis \| Mikroökonometrie \| Microeconometrics

freely available

Full text |

More access options

doi.org

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

Which error do you want to report?

Report: URL of this record is broken

Please note: Sometimes more than one URL is available for a resource. Please click on "More Options" to display these URLs

Report: Addition of an URL to that resource

Please note: Sometimes more than one URL is available for a resource. Please click on "More Options" to display these URLs

Report: The language(s) of that resource is/are…

Please note: Required language not in the list? Please use comment field

Report: Addition of an identifier to that resource

Report: report typo

Report: Add statement

Report: Add keywords

Please use the commentary box to describe other errors

Would you like to receive a feedback?

Commentary

Please type the code from the image

For general questions please use this address.

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012981521