Reconciling discrepancies between registration-based and survey-based estimates of fertility in Mongolia
The two main data sources for the estimation of total fertility in Mongolia give figures that differ by between one-half and one child per woman. We investigated two possible explanations for these discrepancies: (i) that data on births collected in the vital registration system are incomplete and under-estimate fertility; and (ii) that fertility is over-estimated when estimates are based on data from sample surveys. We find that the under-counting of single women is the main source of the discrepancies. After adjustment, survey-based fertility estimates are very close to the figures based on data from the vital registration system. The analysis underscores the risks of taking survey-based demographic indicators as the 'Gold Standard'. Demographers need to undertake more systematic studies on this important issue.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Spoorenberg, Thomas |
Published in: |
Population Studies. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0032-4728. - Vol. 68.2014, 3, p. 375-382
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Demographic changes in Myanmar since 1983 : an examination of official data
Spoorenberg, Thomas, (2013)
-
The concentration of reproduction during the fertility transition in developing countries
Spoorenberg, Thomas, (2024)
-
Is Buddhism the low fertility religion of Asia?
Skirbekk, Vegard, (2015)
- More ...