Reference to Extrinsic Material to Resolve Ambiguity in Definition of Beneficiaries of Whenua Topu Trust : Pirika v Eru - Te Ngae Farm Trust

Pirika v Eru, heard in the Māori Appellate Court, was an appeal from Easthope v Pirika, and concerned a disagreement among the trustees of the Te Ngae Farm Trust as to who should benefit from the trust. The case turned on the interpretation of the trust deed. The Court held that extrinsic sources could be used as an aid for interpretation. In this particular case, the Waitangi Tribunal report and the following settlement with the Crown were used to decide a narrower interpretation was needed

Year of publication:	2020
Authors:	Jones, Carwyn
Publisher:	[S.l.] : SSRN

freely available

Full text |

More access options

Check Google Scholar

In German libraries (KVK)

Which error do you want to report?

Report: URL of this record is broken

Please note: Sometimes more than one URL is available for a resource. Please click on "More Options" to display these URLs

Report: Addition of an URL to that resource

Please note: Sometimes more than one URL is available for a resource. Please click on "More Options" to display these URLs

Report: The language(s) of that resource is/are…

Please note: Required language not in the list? Please use comment field

Report: Addition of an identifier to that resource

Report: report typo

Report: Add statement

Report: Add keywords

Please use the commentary box to describe other errors

Would you like to receive a feedback?

Commentary

Please type the code from the image

For general questions please use this address.

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014139300

A service of the