- 1 Risk Assessment Methodologies for Critical Infrastructures. Setting the scene
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 The policy framework in EU and worldwide
- 1.2.1 The European programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)
- 1.2.2 The US Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP)
- 1.2.3 National Strategy and Action Plan for Critical Infrastructure Protection in Canada
- 2 State of the art of Risk Assessment methodologies in EU and worldwide
- 2.1 Criteria for methodology assessment
- 2.2 Risk Assessment methodologies: Theoretical Background
- 2.3 Risk Assessment methodologies in EU and worldwide
- 2.3.1 Better Infrastructure Risk and Resilience (BIRR)
- 2.3.2 Protection of Critical Infrastructures - Baseline Protection Concept (BMI)
- 2.3.3 CARVER2
- 2.3.4 Critical Infrastructure Modelling Simulation (CIMS)
- 2.3.5 Critical Infrastructure Protection Decision Support System (CIPDSS)
- 2.3.6 Critical Infrastructure Protection modelling and Analysis (CIPMA)
- 2.3.7 CommAspen
- 2.3.8 COUNTERACT
- 2.3.9 The DECRIS approach
- 2.3.10 European Risk Assessment and Contingency Planning Methodologies for Interconnected Energy Networks (EURACOM)
- 2.3.11 Fast Analysis Infrastructure Tool (FAIT)
- 2.3.12 Multilayer Infrastructure Network (MIN)
- 2.3.13 Modular Dynamic Model
- 2.3.14 Agent-Based Laboratory for Economics (N-ABLE)
- 2.3.15 Net-Centric Effects-based operations MOdel (NEMO)
- 2.3.16 Network Security Risk Assessment modelling (NSRAM)
- 2.3.17 RAMCAP-Plus
- 2.3.18 Risk and Vulnerability analysis (RVA )
- 2.3.19 Sandia Risk Assessment Methodology
- 2.3.20 National Infrastructure Protection Plan Risk Management Framework
- 2.3.21 Risk Management for Critical Infrastructure Sectors (Canada)
- 2.4 Gap analysis
- References
- Summary table of risk assessment methodologies
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10010528094