Rotten apples and sterling examples : norm-based moral reasoning and peer influences on honesty
Year of publication: |
2024
|
---|---|
Authors: | Huddart, Steven J. ; Qu, Hong |
Published in: |
Journal of management accounting research : JMAR. - Sarasota, Fla. : Assoc., ISSN 1049-2127, ZDB-ID 1101530-5. - Vol. 36.2024, 2, p. 123-140
|
Subject: | financial incentives | nonfinancial incentives | compensation | earnings management | honesty | dishonesty | peer effects | social norms | social preference | Soziale Norm | Social norm | Soziale Gruppe | Social group | Experiment | Anreiz | Incentives | Bilanzpolitik | Accounting policy | Prinzipal-Agent-Theorie | Agency theory | Leistungsanreiz | Performance incentive | Ethik | Ethics | Verhaltensökonomik | Behavioral economics | Unternehmensethik | Business ethics | Leistungsentgelt | Performance pay | Führungskräfte | Managers | Soziale Beziehungen | Social relations | Managervergütung | Executive compensation |
-
How much does honesty cost? : small bonuses can motivate ethical behavior
Wang, Long, (2017)
-
Earnings manipulation, corporate governance and executive stock option grants : evidence from Taiwan
Wu, Ming-cheng, (2012)
-
How powerful CFOs camouflage and exploit equity-based incentive compensation
Collins, Denton, (2018)
- More ...
-
How do market prices and cheap talk affect coordination?
Qu, Hong, (2013)
-
The joint effect of justification and ambiguity on operating decision distortion
Qu, Hong, (2024)
-
Barron, Orie E., (2014)
- More ...