Second-Order Devolution: Data and Doubt
In this article, we explore changes in state--local relations. Our interest is the degree to which states have devolved power and authority to their localities … or not. From our empirical tests, we conclude that although centralization was the dominant trend from the mid-1950s until the mid-1980s, the pattern since then has been somewhat uneven and variable across states. A survey of city managers supports a finding of a loss of local power at the hands of the states, but a survey of legislators offers an alternative perspective. We conclude with a discussion of the meaning and implications of state centralization and suggestions about how the concept could be captured more comprehensively. Copyright , Oxford University Press.
Authors: | Ann O'M. Bowman ; Kearney, Richard C. |
---|---|
Published in: |
Publius: The Journal of Federalism. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0048-5950. - Vol. 41, 4, p. 563-585
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Bowman, Ann O'M., (1986)
-
Labor relations in the public sector
Kearney, Richard C., (1992)
-
Patterns of union decline and growth : an organizational ecology perspective
Kearney, Richard C., (2003)
- More ...