Simulating a Sequential Coalition Formation Process for the Climate Change Problem : First Come, But Second Served?
We analyze stability of self-enforcing climate agreements based on a data set generated by the CLIMNEG world simulation model (CWSM), version 1.2. We consider two new aspects which appear important in actual treaty-making. First, we consider a sequential coalition formation process where players can make proposals which are either accepted or countered by other proposals. Second, we analyze whether a moderator, like an international organization, even without enforcement power, can improve upon globally suboptimal outcomes through coordinating actions by making recommendations that must be Pareto-improving to all parties. We discuss the conceptual difficulties of implementing our algorithm
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Eyckmans, Johan ; Finus, Michael ; Rundshagen, Bianca |
Publisher: |
[S.l.] : SSRN |
Subject: | Klimawandel | Climate change | Theorie | Theory | Klimaschutz | Climate protection | Koalition | Coalition | Simulation |
Saved in:
freely available
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource (49 p) |
---|---|
Series: | FEEM Working Paper ; No. 109.2009 |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments February 4, 2010 erstellt |
Other identifiers: | 10.2139/ssrn.1547905 [DOI] |
Classification: | C79 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory. Other ; H87 - International Fiscal Issues ; Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014198311