Skewness as an explanation of gambling by locally risk averse agents
Within the expected utility framework skewness of return has been suggested as a rationale for why risk averse gamblers might choose to gamble when expected returns are negative. The argument is that risk-averse agents desire positive skewness, ceteris paribus, and are prepared to trade off a lower mean return for more skewness. This article demonstrates with a counter example that this argument is, in general, erroneous.
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Cain, M. ; Peel, D. ; Law, D. |
Published in: |
Applied Economics Letters. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1350-4851. - Vol. 9.2002, 15, p. 1025-1028
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The favourite-longshot bias and market efficiency in UK football betting
Cain, Michael, (2000)
-
The relationship between two indicators of insider trading in British racetrack betting
Cain, Michael, (2001)
-
The incidence of insider trading in betting markets and the Gabriel and Marsden anomaly
Cain, Michael, (2001)
- More ...