Skyscraper height and the business cycle: separating myth from reality
This article is the first to rigorously test how skyscraper height and output co-move. Because builders can use their buildings for nonrational or nonpecuniary gains, it is widely believed that height competition occurs near the business cycle peaks. This would suggest that extreme building height is a leading indicator of GDP, since the tallest buildings are likely to be completed at or near the peak of a cycle. To test these claims, first we look at both the announcement and the completion dates for record-breaking buildings and find there is very little correlation with the business cycle. Second, cointegration and Granger causality tests show that while height and output are cointegrated, height does not Granger cause output. These results are robust for the United States, Canada, China and Hong Kong.
Year of publication: |
2015
|
---|---|
Authors: | Barr, Jason ; Mizrach, Bruce ; Mundra, Kusum |
Published in: |
Applied Economics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0003-6846. - Vol. 47.2015, 2, p. 148-160
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Skyscraper Height and the Business Cycle: International Time Series Evidence
Barr, Jason, (2011)
-
Skyscraper height and the business cycle : separating myth from reality
Barr, Jason, (2015)
-
Skyscraper Height and the Business Cycle : Separating Myth from Reality
Barr, Jason, (2014)
- More ...