State aid modernization and its implications for the assessment of large investment projects: The relevance of market screens in the regional aid guidelines
The Regional Aid Guidelines foresee specific screens for an in-depth assessment of Large Investment Projects (LIPs): an in-depth assessment is initiated if the market share of the aid beneficiary is above 25% or the investment results in a capacity expansion above 5% in a declining market. It is currently being discussed within the broader State Aid Modernization package and also due to a recent court ruling on the case Propapier whether these market screens should stay as they are. Based on a dataset of all LIP cases notified under the 2006 Regional Aid Guidelines, we evaluate those market screens and find that the screens do have power to identify problematic cases – cases with a below average expected aid effectiveness and aid measures targeting specific industries. We also find, however, that the market screens are affected by a severe implementation problem and, hence, do not help to shorten phase I investigations. From a conceptual perspective, they are also not capable of identifying some of the potentially most problematic regional State aid cases. Policy options are discussed.
Year of publication: |
2012-10-18
|
---|---|
Authors: | Friederiszick, Hans W. ; Tosini, Nicola |
Institutions: | European School of Management and Technology (ESMT) |
Subject: | competition policy | regional state aid | subsidies | anti-competitive effects |
Saved in:
Extent: | application/pdf |
---|---|
Series: | ESMT Research Working Papers. - ISSN 1866-3494. |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Notes: | Number ESMT-12-05 25 pages |
Classification: | H81 - Governmental Loans, Loan Guarantees, and Credits ; L4 - Antitrust Policy ; O25 - Industrial Policy ; R58 - Regional Development Policy |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010635596