Student effort: standards vs. tournaments
In this article we compare a competency system based on an absolute standard vs. a competitive grading system (tournament) in terms of the student effort level they are able to motivate. We prove, unlike other previous work, that more risk does not always discourage effort under a competency grading system. Furthermore, relative advantage depends crucially on the nature of the noise distorting academic achievement. If systematic factors prevail then a tournament is preferred to a competency system based on absolute standards, while if idiosyncratic factors predominate the last is more efficient. Comparisons are effective only and only if the passing standard is fixed at the efficient level that promotes in the student the highest optimal effort.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Landeras, Pedro |
Published in: |
Applied Economics Letters. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1350-4851. - Vol. 16.2009, 9, p. 965-969
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Student effort : standards vs. tournaments
Landeras, Pedro, (2009)
-
The effect of family background on student effort
Kuehn, Zoƫ, (2014)
-
Could do better: the effectiveness of incentives and competition in schools
De Fraja, Gianni, (2006)
- More ...