- Executive Summary
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Regulatory Models
- 3. Legal Part
- 4. Economic Parts
- 4.1 Regulatory Indices
- 4.2 Market Outcomes: Transaction Costs
- 4.3 Market Outcomes: Assessment of Service
- 4.4 Econometric Analysis
- 5. Case Studies
- 5.1 England and Wales: Lawyers and Licensed Conveyancers System
- 5.2 Germany: Latin Notary System
- 5.3 Netherlands: Deregulated Notary System
- 5.4 Sweden: Licensed Real Estate Agent System
- Conclusions and Way Forward
- Key Findings
- Way forward
- I. Introduction
- 1. Background
- 2. Aims and Methodology
- 3. Approach and Structure
- II. Size of the legal conveyancing services market in the EU27
- III. Legal Part
- 1. Definition: Conveyancing disaggregated
- 2. Types of Professionals and Services Offered
- 2.1 Real Estate Agents
- 2.2 Technical Services
- 2.3 Legal Services
- 3. Mandatory or Voluntary Involvement and Scope of Services
- 4. Professional Regulation
- 4.1 Real Estate Agents
- 4.2 Latin Notaries
- 4.3 Lawyers
- 5. Justifications for Restrictive Professional Regulation
- 5.1 The Latin Notary System
- 5.2 The Dutch deregulated notary system
- 5.3 The Lawyer System
- 5.4 The Scandinavian Licensed Real Estate Agent System
- 6. Summary on Regulatory Models
- IV. Regulatory Indices
- 1. Introduction and Methodology
- 2. Regulation Indices for EU Countries
- 2.1 Countries with “Latin notary” (LN-countries)
- 2.2 Countries without “Latin” notaries
- 2.3 Comparing “different worlds” of regulation of legal services inconveyancing
- 3. Sensitivity tests with different models of weighting
- Annex to Chapter IV: Sensitivity tests for regulation indiceswith different models of weighting
- 1. MERI and MCRI for different professions: outcomes of alternativemethodologies of weighting
- 2. Overall regulation indices: outcomes of alternative methodologies ofweighting
- 3. Comparing “different worlds” of regulation of legal services inconveyancing with three alternative models o
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009347532