Submission to 'Creeping Acquisitions' Consultation Paper
This submission responds to the Australian Treasury's consultation paper Creeping Acquisitions on the notification requirements for mergers and acquisitions (M&A), notably where 'creeping acquisitions' may occur. The response discusses why policymakers need to distinguish between mergers and acquisitions; and how regulators can keep pace with M&A developments in economics, finance, taxation and risk management. It contends that Section 50 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwlth) may not capture the complexity of markets, and that M&A practitioners will structure deals to avoid or minimise the 'aggregation model' and 'substantial market power model'. Thus, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) and the Australian Competition Tribunal have had limited success due to M&A practitioner stratagems. The submission suggests that: (1) other parties in the M&A ecosystem could be involved to encourage timely information revelation in markets, (2)notification requirements be developed for specific risks and scenarios; and (3) the analytical foundations of the 'With or Without' test be strengthened to anticipate market distortions such as asset bubbles, market failures and systemic risk that require regulatory supervision and intervention.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Burns, Alex |
Publisher: |
Australian Government, The Treasury |
Subject: | Policy and Political Science |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Managing trust and relationships in PPPs: some Australian experiences
Teicher, Julian, (2006)
-
Does coaching work without mentorship in management development?
Ellsum, William, (2005)
-
Gamage, Ari, (1997)
- More ...
Similar items by person