Takeover Contests, Toeholds and Deterrence
We consider a setting in which two potential buyers, one with a prior toehold and one without, compete in a takeover modeled as an ascending auction with participating costs. The toeholder is more aggressive during the takeover process because she is also a seller of her own shares. The non-toeholder anticipates this extra-aggressiveness of the toeholder. Thus, he is deterred from participating unless he has a high valuation for the target company. This leads to large inefficiency losses. For many configurations, expected target returns are first increasing then decreasing in the size of the toehold. Copyright © The editors of the "Scandinavian Journal of Economics" 2009 .
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ettinger, David |
Published in: |
Scandinavian Journal of Economics. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 1467-9442. - Vol. 111.2009, 1, p. 103-124
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Efficiency in auctions with crossholdings
Ettinger, David, (2003)
-
Bidding among friends and enemies
Ettinger, David, (2003)
-
Ettinger, David, (2008)
- More ...