THE ATTITUDES OF THE CLASSICAL ECONOMISTS TO INCOME INEQUALITY
The issue of income inequality was neglected in the recent economic literature until perhaps the last two decades or so. The reason for this neglect may stem from the deterministic and mechanical way the issue has been treated in the works of the neoclassical economists. However, the classical economists whom many consider predecessors of neoclassicism represent a contrast. This is particularly evident in the works of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Jeremy Bentham. Their writings reflect on one hand their belief that their ideal economic system would be more egalitarian and more fair than the existing system and on the other, that they were concerned about the income inequality which inevitably would result from their recommended system of laissez-faire. Smith expressed his concern for giving "the business aspect of life" a priority, i.e. that it might be in conflict with what might be called "the virtuous aspect of life". And Mill, carrying on the tradition of his predecessors, but confronted with considerable pressures appearing against the system, uneasily put his theories to test against those which promised a more humane society than the system of private property was able to offer during his days.
Authors: | GEIRSSON, FINNUR |
---|---|
Publisher: |
Florida State University Libraries |
Subject: | History |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
CMS: a satirical critique of three narrative histories
Mills, Albert J., (2013)
-
Locating young refugees historically : attending to age position in humanitarianism
Hart, Jason, (2014)
-
A history of Australian corporate bonds
Black, Susan, (2012)
- More ...