The Political Power of Big Business: A Response to Bell and Hindmoor
There has been a recent resurgence of interest in debates about the power of business (Culpepper 2011; Bell 2012) and Bell and Hindmoor (2013) make an important, theoretically informed, but empirically rooted, contribution to that debate. In this response, we address both aspects of their contribution, arguing that their treatment of Lindblom is partial and, consequently, so is their explanation of the case. As such, we largely rely on their narrative of the evolution of the Australian mining tax, focusing first on critically examining Bell and Hindmoor's theoretical position, before turning to their analysis of the case.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Marsh, David ; Lewis, Chris |
Published in: |
New Political Economy. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1356-3467. - Vol. 19.2014, 4, p. 628-633
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The politics of Australia's mining tax : a response to Marsh and Lewis
Bell, Stephen, (2014)
-
The political power of big business : a response to Bell and Hindmoor
Marsh, David, (2014)
-
Privatisation in Britain : an idea in search of a policy
Marsh, David, (1990)
- More ...