The relative efficiency of environmental policy instruments in a second-best setting with costly monitoring and enforcement
In this paper we incorporate monitoring and enforcement aspects in the choice of environmental policy instruments in a general equilibrium framework. Goulder et al. (J.Pub.Econ., 1999) look into the choice of policy instruments in the presence of distortionary taxes. We extend this model by no longer assuming full compliance from firms. A violating firm is caught with a certain probability by the inspection agency. Once a violator is detected, he always has to pay a fine. With a positive, finite expected fine and a probability of detection smaller than unity, there will always be a certain proportion of noncompliance in the economy. We calculate the gross efficiency costs of different policy instruments (emission tax, output tax, tradable permits and technology mandate). We illustrate the model for different price instruments (emission tax, output tax and tradable permits). We find that the relative inefficiency of grandfathered tradable permits vis- à-vis emission taxes found in a second-best setting with perfect compliance, is strongly decreased with imperfect compliance.
Year of publication: |
2001-01
|
---|---|
Authors: | Rousseau, Sandra ; Proost, Stef |
Institutions: | Centrum voor Economische Studiën, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Relative Efficiency of Market-based Environmental Policy Instruments with Imperfect Compliance
Rousseau, Sandra, (2004)
-
The Cost Effectiveness of Environmental Policy Instruments in the Presence of Imperfect Compliance
Rousseau, Sandra, (2002)
-
Catching or fining speeders: a political economy approach
Delhaye, Eef, (2007)
- More ...