TRIGGER-POINT MECHANISM AND CONDITIONAL COMMITMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR ENTRY, COLLUSION, AND WELFARE
"When fixed, sunk investment costs are high, firms may not have sufficient incentive to enter the market unless future entry is constrained. In this case, the government faces a dilemma between a full commitment and noncommitment of restricted future entry. A way out is to consider a commitment conditional on the realization of the uncertain parameters, such as the trigger-point mechanism (TPM) that sets conditions on current production level, excess capacity, and demand growth under which future entry will be allowed. This article shows that the TPM facilitates the incumbents' collusion but may improve social welfare under certain circumstances." ("JEL" L13, L43, L50, H10, H54) Copyright No Claim to Original U.S. Government Works.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | QIU, LARRY D. ; CHENG, LEONARD K. ; FUNG, MICHAEL K. |
Published in: |
Contemporary Economic Policy. - Western Economic Association International - WEAI, ISSN 1074-3529. - Vol. 25.2007, 2, p. 156-169
|
Publisher: |
Western Economic Association International - WEAI |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges: an empirical study
Fung, Michael K., (2003)
-
Trigger-point mechanism and conditional commitment : implications for entry, collusion, and welfare
Qiu, Larry D., (2007)
-
Anti-dumping measures as a tool of protectionism: A mechanism design approach
Cheng, Leonard K., (2001)
- More ...