Two sides of a coin? New urbanism and gated communities
<title>Abstract</title> Contemporary residential building trends reflect concerns about privacy, traffic, and managing difference. Despite the radically different premises behind New Urbanism and gated communities, I find on closer inspection that they both respond to similar perceived crises in our cities. New Urbanism answers urban challenges with bold efforts to recapture the strengths of older communities and to supplant unwanted suburban patterns with those believed to have greater resilience and public purpose. Gated communities reveal popular skepticism about the potential for improving urban conditions and a consequent desire to retreat to protected compounds. In both cases, the new suburbs generally provide housing primarily for the most affluent among us and represent the ascendance of private over public interests. By examining the Canadian urban context, this article explores some ways in which New Urbanism and gated communities differ, while also highlighting the characteristics and dilemmas they share.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Grant, Jill L. |
Published in: |
Housing Policy Debate. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1051-1482. - Vol. 18.2007, 3, p. 481-501
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Grant, Jill L., (2013)
-
Old Boys Down Home: Immigration and Social Integration in Halifax
Grant, Jill L., (2013)
-
Precarious creativity : immigrant cultural workers
Grant, Jill L., (2013)
- More ...