Uneven Convergence in Development? The Case of India’s Lines of Credit to Africa

This paper examines the uneven convergence between Indian development cooperation and the (so-called) ‘traditional’ development establishment. Using the case of Indian government concessional lines of credit (LoCs), handled by the Export–Import Bank, it demonstrates how diplomatic, strategic and party-political interests drove a major revision in LoC policy in 2015. The Indian government directly adopted policies from the World Bank and the UK’s Department for International Development on project selection and design, tendering and monitoring. These were designed to increase technical proficiency, timeliness and development outcomes but also to bring about a change in the companies undertaking these projects. Such policies indicate some degree of departure from the non-interventionist, non-hierarchical norms of India’s original South–South Cooperation, whereby the recipient (in theory) exclusively made decisions over what projects were done and how. To some extent, that role is now shared. This partially mirrors changes among the DAC donors, many of whom are redefining the definition of OECD Official Development Assistance (ODA), increasing blended finance and focusing more on economic development (and less on poverty reduction). However, while converging in these aspects of technical planning and implementation, the political and strategic interests driving the LoC changes did not extend to examining developmental or environmental outcomes; state-to-state relations continue to have primacy in the project-approval process. The paper therefore finds uneven convergence in India’s development cooperation, with change in technical policies but greater persistence in norms. This reflects the wider multidirectional evolution of the global development sphere