When is a truncated covariance function on the line a covariance function on the circle?
Let [gamma] denote the covariance function of a real stationary process on . Define a new function on [-K, K] by [lambda]K(t) = [gamma](t), t [epsilon] [-K, K]. Note that by identifying the end points of the interval, we may interpret [lambda]K as a function on the circle with circumference 2K. We address the following question: if [gamma] is a covariance function on the line, will [lambda]K be a covariance function on the circle? We identify one class of covariance functions for which the answer is "yes" for all K > 0, and a second class for which it is "yes" for all K sufficiently large. However, our most substantial result is a negative one, and the answer will frequently be "no" for all K > 0. A statistical consequence of the positive results is mentioned briefly.
Year of publication: |
1995
|
---|---|
Authors: | Wood, Andrew T. A. |
Published in: |
Statistics & Probability Letters. - Elsevier, ISSN 0167-7152. - Vol. 24.1995, 2, p. 157-164
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Fourier coefficients Missing data argument Positive definite Spectral density Stationary Gaussian process |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Directions Old and New : Palaeomagnetism and Fisher (1953) Meet Modern Statistics
Scealy, Janice L., (2021)
-
Wood, Andrew T. A., (2001)
-
Saddlepoint approximations for the Bingham and Fisher–Bingham normalising constants
Kume, A., (2005)
- More ...