Who Invests in Training if Contracts are Temporary? - Empirical Evidence for Germany Using Selection Correction
This study deals with the effect of fixed-term contracts on work-related training. Though previous studies found a negative effect of fixed-term contracts on the participation in training, from the theoretical point of view it is not clear whether workers with fixed-term contracts receive less or more training, compared to workers with permanent contracts. In addition to the existing strand of literature, we especially distinguish between employer- and employee-financed training in order to allow for diverging investment patterns of worker and firm. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP), we estimate a bivariate probit model to control for selection effects that may arise from unobservable factors, affecting both participation in training and holding fixed-term contracts. Finding negative effects for employer-sponsored, as well as for employee-sponsored training, leads us to conclude that workers with fixed-term contracts do not compensate for lower firm investments.
Year of publication: |
2006-07
|
---|---|
Authors: | Sauermann, Jan |
Institutions: | Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) |
Subject: | training | fixed-term contracts | bivariate probit model |
Saved in:
Extent: | application/pdf |
---|---|
Series: | |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Number 14 |
Classification: | C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; J24 - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity ; J42 - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005398662