Why Do Firms Engage in Selective Hedging? Evidence from the Gold Mining Industry
The widespread practice of managers speculating by incorporating their market views into firms' hedging programs (“selective hedging”) remains a puzzle. Using a 10-year sample of North American gold mining firms, we find no evidence that selective hedging is more prevalent among firms that are believed to possess an information advantage. In contrast, we find strong evidence that selective hedging is more prevalent among financially constrained firms, suggesting that this practice is driven by asset substitution motives. We detect weak relationships between selective hedging and some corporate governance measures but find no evidence of a link between selective hedging and managerial compensation
Year of publication: |
2015
|
---|---|
Authors: | Adam, Tim |
Other Persons: | Fernando, Chitru S. (contributor) ; Salas, Jesus M. (contributor) |
Publisher: |
[2015]: [S.l.] : SSRN |
Subject: | Goldbergbau | Gold mining | Hedging | Risikomanagement | Risk management | Schätzung | Estimation | Corporate Governance | Corporate governance | Spekulation | Speculation | Managervergütung | Executive compensation |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Why do firms engage in selective hedging?
Adam, Tim R., (2012)
-
Why do firms engage in selective hedging?
Adam, Tim R., (2012)
-
Managerial overconfidence and corporate risk management
Adam, Tim, (2012)
- More ...
Similar items by person