WHY MOST FIRMS CHOOSE LINEAR HEDGING STRATEGIES
<heading id="h1" level="1" implicit="yes" format="display">Abstract</heading>I investigate the efficiency of alternative hedging strategies of nonfinancial firms facing hedgeable price risk, unhedgeable quantity risk, and financial contracting costs in low-profit events. The analysis suggests that variance-minimizing hedging strategies are very close in economic terms to optimal, value-maximizing hedging strategies for most firms. Furthermore, the marginal gains from shifting to nonlinear hedging strategies are often small enough to be neglected. These results illuminate some puzzling findings in survey studies of firms' hedging practices and suggest an alternative view on firms' selective hedging practices termed "cautious selective hedging." Copyright (c) 2009 The Southern Finance Association and the Southwestern Finance Association.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Frestad, Dennis |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial Research. - Southern Finance Association - SFA, ISSN 0270-2592. - Vol. 32.2009, 2, p. 157-167
|
Publisher: |
Southern Finance Association - SFA Southwestern Finance Association - SWFA |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
How fair-value accounting can influence firm hedging
Beisland, Leif, (2013)
-
Convex costs and the hedging paradox
Frestad, Dennis, (2010)
-
Corporate hedging under a resource rent tax regime
Frestad, Dennis, (2010)
- More ...