Showing 1 - 10 of 99
We explore whether competitive outcomes arise in an experimental implementation of a market game, introduced by Shubik (1973) [21]. Market games obtain Pareto inferior (strict) Nash equilibria, in which some or possibly all markets are closed. We find that subjects do not coordinate on autarkic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009249212
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014437492
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011432103
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011852837
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013188587
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011982871
We consider an extension of Tullock's (1980) N-player contest under which prize valuations may vary across players. We show that the pure-strategy equilibrium of this contest is unique. We also establish the following results: rent dissipation increases, individual winning probabilities...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542637
We investigate an economy in which firms have different risks to go bankrupt. We observe two things: first, workers in firms with higher bankruptcy risk (bad firms) always work less than workers in good firms. Second, the CEOs of bad firms may nonetheless receive larger wages. Copyright...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005391090
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005413647
In this article we consider a model where boundedly rational agents choose both which coordination game to play and what action to take in that game, when their information and mobility are limited and changes over time. We completely characterize both short-run and long-run outcomes. There are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011263923