Showing 1 - 10 of 77
Should a seller with private information sell the best or worst goods first? Considering the sequential auction of two stochastically equivalent goods, we find that the seller has an incentive to impress buyers by selling the better good first because the seller's sequencing strategy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005133338
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010542505
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007630686
Sellers benefit on average from revealing information about their goods to buyers, but the incentive to exaggerate undermines the credibility of seller statements. When multiple goods are being auctioned, we show that ordinal cheap talk, which reveals a complete or partial ordering of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005328976
Sellers often make explicit or implicit product claims without providing evidence. We show that such "puffery" of product attributes through pure cheap talk is credible and helps buyers make a better decision. Puffing one attribute of a product leads buyers to positively update their impression...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011096402
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005020696
We find that bargaining over multiple issues as a bundle allows for credible cheap talk on the relative importance of the issues even when interests are directly opposed on each issue. This communication increases the chance of agreement by allowing the offerer to concede more on the issue of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005150896
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005270159
We consider the credibility, persuasiveness, and informativeness of multidimensional cheap talk by an expert to a decision maker. We find that an expert with state-independent preferences can always make credible comparative statements that trade off the expert's incentive to exaggerate on each...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008752626
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008818200