Showing 1 - 10 of 27
We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- and between-subject experimental designs, and we investigate how teams aggregate individual preferences. We find that team decisions reveal less inequality aversion than individual initial proposals in team...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010359304
We study whether selection affects motivation. In our experiment subjects first answer a personality questionnaire …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014094242
We show with a laboratory experiment that individuals adjust their moral principles to the situation and to their …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009545257
In an experiment on a subjective claims problem we compare three unanimity bargaining procedures - the Demand, the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010194818
In a subjective claims problem several agents have contributed to the production of a cake which is to be divided among them. Since contributions are difficult to compare and the production function is nonlinear, agents'subjective evaluations of claims are likely to be conflicting. In a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010194821
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001583678
prices. -- credence goods ; experts ; pricing ; experiment ; other regarding preferences ; signalling ; projection bias …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009536497
prices. -- credence goods ; experts ; pricing ; experiment ; other regarding preferences ; signalling ; projection bias …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009741521
Evidence on behavior of experts in credence goods markets raises an important causality issue: Do "fair prices" induce "good behavior", or do "good experts" post "fair prices"? To answer this question we propose and test a model with three seller types: "the good" choose fair prices and behave...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013107208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011293821