Showing 1 - 10 of 247
This paper examines why unsolicited ratings tend to be lower than solicited ratings. Both self-selection among issuers and strategic conservatism of rating agencies may be reasonable explanations. Analyses of default incidences of non-U.S. borrowers between January 1996 and December 2006 show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003904071
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003989549
This paper examines why unsolicited ratings tend to be lower than solicited ratings. Both self-selection among issuers and strategic conservatism of rating agencies may be reasonable explanations. Analyses of default incidences of non-U.S. borrowers between January 1996 and December 2006 show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012759458
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001777149
We analyze gender differences associated with loan officer performance. Using a unique data set for a commercial bank over the period 1996 to 2006, we find that loans screened and monitored by female loan officers show a statistically and economically significant lower likelihood to turn...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013116890
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009247256
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009776238
In this paper we investigate the implications of providing loan officers with a compensation structure that rewards loan volume and penalizes poor performance versus a fixed wage unrelated to performance. We study detailed transaction information for more than 45,000 loans issued by 240 loan...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010378353
This paper investigates whether the stock market reacts to unsolicited ratings for a sample of S&P rated firms from January 1996 to December 2005. We first analyze the stock market reaction associated with the assignment of an initial unsolicited rating. We find evidence that this reaction is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003315419
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003468329