Showing 1 - 10 of 64
We argue exogenous random treatment is insufficient for valid inference regarding the sign and magnitude of causal effects in dynamic environments. In such settings, treatment responses must be understood as contingent upon the typically unmodeled policy generating process. With binary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011186611
We argue exogenous random treatment is insufficient for valid inference regarding the sign and magnitude of causal effects in dynamic environments. In such settings, treatment responses must be understood as contingent upon the typically unmodeled policy generating process. With binary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011189104
In this paper, the authors analyze optimal financial structure for an incumbent and potential entrant accounting for feedback effects in secondary asset markets.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005011621
We develop a dynamic model with endogenous choice of leverage, distributions, and real investment in the presence of a graduated corporate income tax, individual taxes on interest and corporate distributions, costs of financial distress, and equity flotation costs. The dynamic trade-off...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005051416
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005182424
We determine optimal security design and retention of asset-backed securities by a privately informed issuer with positive NPV uses for immediate cash. In canonical models, investors revert to prior beliefs if issuers pool at zero-retentions (originate-to-distribute), and separating equilibria...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008915803
We examine screening incentives, welfare and the case for mandatory skin-in-the-game. Ex ante banks can screen, using interim private information to choose retentions and structuring. Ex post speculators trade with rational hedging investors. Absent regulation, there is a separating equilibrium...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009024483
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005376636
What determines securitization levels, and should they be regulated? To address these questions we develop a model where originators can exert unobservable effort to increase expected asset quality, subsequently having private information regarding quality when selling ABS to rational investors....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011166577
Privately informed owners securitizing assets signal positive information by retaining sufficient interest. Signaling provides social benefits, allowing uninformed investors to insure without fearing adverse selection. Instead of signaling, owners of high value assets may prefer a pooling...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010861413