Similar Search Results

Narrow search

Distributive and reciprocal fairness : what can we learn from the heterogeneity of social preferences?

Kamas, Linda; Preston, Anne E. - In: Journal of economic psychology : research in economic … 33 (2012) 3, pp. 538-553

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009703981

Altruistic responses to the september 11 terrorist attacks : some evidence from dictator games

Kamas, Linda; Baum, Sandra R.; Preston, Anne E. - In: Eastern economic journal 31 (2005) 4, pp. 551-562

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003328319

Altruism in individual and joint-giving decisions : what's gender got to do with it?

Kamas, Linda; Preston, Anne E.; Baum, Sandra R. - In: Feminist economics 14 (2008) 3, pp. 23-50

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003744092

Can social preferences explain gender differences in economic behavior?

Kamas, Linda; Preston, Anne E. - In: Journal of economic behavior & organization : JEBO 116 (2015), pp. 525-539

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011567955

What Can Social Preferences Tell Us about Charitable Giving? Evidence on Responses to Price of Giving, Matching, and Rebates

Kamas, Linda - 2009

This paper investigates the relationship between heterogeneous social preferences and charitable giving under alternative prices of giving and types of subsidies (matching and rebates). We compare within-person decision-making in alternative contexts to determine whether there is carry over in...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012718680

Empathy, gender, and prosocial behavior

Kamas, Linda; Preston, Anne E. - In: Journal of behavioral and experimental economics 92 (2021), pp. 1-12

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012643564

What can social preferences tell us about charitable giving? Evidence on responses to price of giving, matching, and rebates

Kamas, Linda; Preston, Anne - In: Charity with choice, (pp. 165-199). 2010

This chapter investigates the relationship between heterogeneous social preferences and charitable giving under alternative prices of giving and types of subsidies. Using 10 allocation decisions, we categorize participants’ social preferences as self-interested, inequity averse, or social...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015381529