Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Does the case for tackling human-induced climatic change become stronger as mean-preserving uncertainty, as measured by the standard deviation of possible outcomes, rises? When excluding the real option policy choice of waiting before acting, I show that a simple set of conditions will ensure...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013049325
The initial hope for climate science was that an improved understanding of what the future might bring would lead to appropriate public policies and effective international climate agreements. Even if that hope is not realized, as now seems likely, scientific advances leading to a more refined...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013017492
Climate change is real and dangerous. Exactly how bad it will get, however, is uncertain. Uncertainty is particularly relevant for estimates of one of the key parameters: equilibrium climate sensitivity—how eventual temperatures will react as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations double....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013029035
We critically assess an almost universal Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) practice. In addition to the central Net Present Value (NPV), analysts frequently also report multiple additional values in what is commonly referred to as ‘NPV sensitivity analysis’. This practice is generally justified...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015158088
We assess how changes in the scientific consensus around equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), as captured by the IPCC’s Fifth (AR5) and Sixth (AR6) Assessment Reports, impact policymakers’ willingness to take climate action. Taking the IPCC’s reports at face value, the ECS estimates in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015197301